VC for alternative energy

Originally published May 17, 2006.

Venture capital investors seem to have one major, common point of reference – the dot come bust of 2000-2001.  That bust followed a record year of VC fundraising – some $106 billion in 2000 among top benchmark firms – and preceded a major fallout of invested dollars across the economy.  The lessons learned all seem to point to greater discipline in VC investments, but that’s not holding back (re-)growth in VC fundraising.  The Associated Press reported in April that venture capital firms had raised some $6 billion in the first quarter of this year, more than 20% over last year’s figure for the same quarter, with projected annual fundraising around $30 billion.  (See the article as published in the Washington Post online: Venture Capital Fundraising Rises in 1Q.pdf.) [Update: The New YorkTimes ran an article suggesting that the renewed vigor in venture capital is not a sign of a new bubble: A Few Signs of Froth Do Not a Bubble Make]

The trends of last year indicated strong venture capital interest in “clean tech” and alternative energy as solar and wind technologies matured and new ventures generated profitable cash flows, buyouts, and IPOs.  In fact, three of the top IPOs of 2005 were solar power companies, as reported by the Wharton Private Equity Review.  [Update: See BW interview with Bill Joy, co-founder of Sun Microsystems and current partner at venture capital firm KPCB: Green: The Next Big Thing.  He thinks greentech is going to provide the next Google in terms of revolutionary wealth-creation.)

Now, the energy market is showing no signs of decreased demand despite continually high gas prices.  As Americans (and others around the world) effectively say “no” to conservation (see James Ellis’ op-ed piece in BW, No Sacrifices, Please), energy demand will continue to grow while limited stocks of fossil fuels (not to mention the political delicacies surrounding the international energy market) keeps a ceiling on supply.  With the proven returns in solar and wind power, and wide interest and policy incentives in ethanol, biomass, and energy storage technologies, the stage could be set for continued successful investment in clean tech industries.

And hopefully in two years the stage will be set to hire this Darden MBA into a successful and growing VC clean tech fund.

Corporate Innovation at Darden

Originally published April 14, 2006.

At the Darden School’s recent “Darden Days” welcome weekend for admitted students, I serendipitously met Professor Jeanne Liedtka, the director of Darden’s Batten Institute for entrepreneurship and innovation.  We talked briefly after a “mock case” discussion that introduced the prospectives to the case method, and I learned more about her courses in strategy and research in corporate innovation - my own fields of interest.

Well, BusinessWeek just turned out a few excellent pieces on innovation, so I thought I’d create a little home for them in this blog as well.

I was really caught by surprise by some of the answers in this Innovation Quiz.  (I scored 5 out of 12, apparently good enough for the quiz to recommend me as chief innovation officer for my company.)

There’s also a great Innovators in Our Midst slideshow (one of my favorite features of BusinessWeek online) on corporations leading innovation in all kinds of industries.

Then there’s the fine analytic piece, Innovative Writing on Innovation, offering five themes emerging from a survey of corporate leaders.

Finally, I’ll add the link to 25 Innovators, 6 Industries.

Hope that’s enough to spark the creative business thinker on a rainy Friday afternoon!

Innovation: buzz word or the real deal?

Originally published April 7, 2006.

From the glossy ads of IBM’s new Innovation business area to the whack jobs on American Inventor, it seems like everyone wants to be an innovator (or wants to hire one).  The emergence of Chief Innovation Officers and business school courses targeting innovation suggest that, in today’s tight market for large cap companies and healthy growth for small and mid-caps, innovation may be today’s killer app.  To my mind, this makes sense conceptually: as markets mature, the potential to exploit market openings diminishes and the need to create revolutionary new products, processes, and especially business models becomes a necessity.

In social entrepreneurship, innovation is never an option.  There are rarely opportunities to exploit; rather, whole new paradigms must be introduced, supported, and grown  – often outside the realm of traditional business.  (See The Economist’s article The hidden wealth of the poor (Nov 2005) in PDF.)

Its encouraging to see innovators finding successes in the realms of social entrepreneurship, such as the Washington Area Housing Partnership in Washington, DC, which is “re-branding” affordable housing initiatives as not just social support programs but prudent community development programs for working citizens.  Check out their story in the Washington Post, A Regional Campaign for Affordable Housing.

This innovation is also being cultivated in the young and passionate minds of academia.  As I head to The Darden School of Business at the University of Virginia, I’m especially interested in the innovation occurring within the University’s Engineering and Architecture schools.  I recently learned of an outstanding initiative in affordable housing at The University of Virginia’s School of Architecture: the ecoMOD program to prototype ecological modular housing.  For a heart-warming insight into the ecoMOD program in Gulf Coast restoration efforts supported by Charlottesville’s most famous author (Mississippi native and UVA parent John Grisham), take a look at this Habitat for Humanity Press Release (PDF).

Further interesting information on ecoMOD and other innovative architectural systems can be found at the Charlottesville Community Design Center’s  exhibition showcase and the Rural Studio, part of the Auburn University School of Architecture program of studies.